|
IMDB rating: 8.40 Plot: After the mysterious death of his Aunt, a confirmed skeptic lawyer, Bryan Becket, dismisses reports that her house is haunted and moves in. Immediately occurrences begin he cannot explain. And beyond the occurrences there is something about the house which gnaws at Becket – some strange connection he senses he has with the house’s past. Soon, the haunting turns personal, he hears voices suggesting clues to a deep mystery. He questions his sanity, seeks medical help, but instead finds assistance in a young psychic who immediately declares, “There’s a very bad secret in this house.” Together they embark on a terrifying journey to uncover the secret – a journey which leads them deep into the recesses of The Skeptic’s own troubled mind. |
Actors: Daly Tim,Arnold Tom,Herrmann Edward,Prosky Robert,Altman Bruce,Coco Lea,DiSalvatore James,Fletcher Steve,Taylor John J.,Silipigno Chris,Foley L.J.,Thriller,
What is the least scientifically accurate website that's been posted by a skeptic here?
There are rules to this.
One answer only, entries with multiple websites are disqualified. You have to choose.
Having some good science on the website offsets bad. One howler is not enough, there has to be a pattern.
If you list a homepage, please indicate whether your entry is for that homepage, or the whole site.
Thank you.
www.globalwarmingisafarce.com
The whole website
Richard the Physicist | Dec 18, 2007
Geez that’s tough. I’m going to go with this article linked today:
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/20 07/2007_10-19/2007-11/pdf/38_711_science .pdf
It’s written by an MD who clearly knows next to nothing about the basics of climate science. After ranting about the IPCC he then tries to disprove the basic premise of man-made global warming by using the water vapor and 0.3% human CO2 contribution arguments. I stopped reading at that point, but I’m sure the rest is just as bad! He also seems to use the usual misleading graphs and ‘past climate cycles were natural’ argument.
He has all the denier bases covered except SUVs on Mars!
Dana1981, Master of Science | Dec 18, 2007
It’s got to be Friends of Science. Here is their home page http://www.friendsofscience.org/
The Friends of Science are the same people who brought you the comedy video "Climate Catastrophy Cancelled" http://www.friendsofscience.org/index.ph p?id=172
It’s a site out of Calgary Alberta Canada that is heavily subsidized by the fossil fuel industry and is closely connected with such climate change deniers as Tim Ball, Tim Patterson, and Ross McKitrick.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?tit le=Friends_of_Science
gwens18a | Dec 18, 2007
Wikipedia….enough said.
bigdmizer | Dec 18, 2007
I’ll go with Wikipedia, your favorite. How is the Quantum Mechanics coming? Didn’t you say that you can’t prove AGW through experiment or formulation, just like you can’t prove Quantum Mechanics through experiments? With such a large gulf between your knowledge and scientific reality, how do you determine what is scientifically accurate and what is a howler?
Jazzbo J | Dec 18, 2007
This one, which I just saw today, is so full of outright lies it makes your head spin:
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/20 07-03-04-1.html
Keith P | Dec 18, 2007









