I Know Who Killed Me
|
IMDB rating: 3.70 Plot: Aubrey Fleming is a regular high school student with friends and family. One night, she unexpectedly disappears. Two weeks later she is found unconscious in the middle of the woods. When spoken to, her loved ones realize she has forgotten her identity and the personality living in her body is Dakota Moss, a character that Aubrey created in one of her stories for an English assignment. Dakota denies ever being Aubrey knowing that they look identical. Now, Dakota must try to unravel the mystery of how her and Aubrey co-exist and find out who abducted Aubrey that night. |
Actors: McDonough Neal,Geraghty Brian,Garrett Spencer,Itzin Gregory,Tofel Thomas,Rowland Rodney,Figlioli David,Adler Michael,Bell Art,Crime,Drama,Thriller,
You aren't open-minded, so stop saying you are.?
Alrighty, first of all let me say I’d appreciate a more thought-out answer than "X is wrong and Y is right jeez how can you not know that" or something ^_^
Well, what I’m wondering is something that confuses me a lot; how people can think that a certain thing is fine up to a point; but past that line it’s wrong. Or how certain things are fine but other things that are the same principle are wrong. Paraphilia (or unusual sexual fetishes) is the most prominent case of it (and the easiest to give examples of) so I’m talking about that.
Basically, depending on where you go, different people will tell you different things are wrong. Go on a beastiality forum and you’ll find hundreds of people who say beastiality is totally natural and fine but that pedophilias are sick freaks and that people who like scat are disturbed. Go to a pedophilia forum (err… do those even exist? ^_^) and you’ll find people who think child sexuality is fine but I’d bet money plenty of them think anybody who wants to have sex with a dog is messed up.
I’ve read a lot of arguments about this sort of thing, but never found anything I would consider remotely valid. Everybody has their own personal standards and they feel anything past them is wrong, regardless of the fact that they can’t actually reason that. I’ve read people say anybody who looks at lolicon hentai (which, in case you don’t know, is basically cartoons of child porn) should be put to death. In my opinion, murder is worse than any victimless crime (looking at pictures is victimless damnit) but when people disagreed with him he called them ignorant morons or whatever.
A great quote I read was "People like to think they’re all open-minded, but they only are until when something offends their personal taste" (or something like that). My mum, for example, occasionally tells me grumpily that I’m closed-minded (because I make lots of prejudiced comments, I’m not really sexist or anything though ^_^) – so she thinks racists are closed minded. But when she sees on the news that somebody killed somebody, she doesn’t go "Wow, those reporters are closed-minded – clearly the murderer just doesn’t agree with society’s current ideas of morals", she says "god that freak is sick".
Basically, I would really appreciate an explanation from somebody who has these boundaries of exactly how they can have faith that the point where they draw the line is the right one when there’s no logical sense behind it, and their reasoning seems to be "because that’s the way it is".
Again, please actually try to explain it to me, I’m asking for help so don’t just give me some stupid 2-line lecture about how I don’t know the way the world works -_-
Wheres the 2nd chapter? Jk jk lol. How they are raised maybe
Glassjaw | Feb 04, 2010